Infrastructure

Best Sandboxes for Tool-Use RL Environments in 2026

Reinforcement learning is reshaping AI development, but training agents demands more than raw GPU power. It requires secure, scalable sandbox environments where thousands of concurrent rollouts can execute safely without compromising production systems. Sandbox startup, throughput, reliability, and integration overhead can materially affect RL experiment iteration time, particularly at high rollout concurrency, which makes sandbox infrastructure a real architectural decision rather than a commodity purchase. The number of sandbox products targeting AI-agent execution and RL-adjacent workloads expanded substantially in 2025 and 2026, and several offerings are currently available in preview. Platforms now advertise massive parallelization for reward function evaluation, accelerated training loops, and enterprise-grade isolation for untrusted code execution. This guide evaluates seven sandbox platforms that can support tool-use RL environment execution, including several general-purpose agent or code-execution products alongside RL-specific infrastructure. It starts with Modal, which combines secure sandboxes, training, inference, batch processing, and notebooks in one code-first platform.

Modal TeamEngineering
July 202620 min read
Best Sandboxes for RL Environments

Key Takeaways

  • Compute access inside the sandbox is a workload question, not a maturity badge: Modal, CoreWeave, and Daytona document GPU-capable sandbox classes, while E2B and Deno publish CPU-and-memory resource models. Modal runs both CPU and GPU workloads, so teams can match compute to the environment rather than to the platform. In-sandbox GPU access matters when environment-side models or accelerated workloads must run inside the sandbox; it is not by itself a measure of production readiness.
  • Startup behavior is described differently by each vendor: Modal is engineered for fast cold starts through memory snapshotting and an optimized filesystem, while Daytona and Deno also support cold starts. Published descriptions across the market are not measured under a common image, region, warm-pool state, readiness definition, percentile, or concurrency level, so they are best read individually.
  • Isolation technology varies across platforms: Firecracker microVMs (E2B), hypervisor-isolated Linux microVMs (Deno), gVisor (Modal, GKE), Hyper-V isolation (Azure Dynamic Sessions), and namespace-isolated Linux containers with optional VM classes (Daytona) each offer different security and performance characteristics.
  • Integrated infrastructure reduces operational complexity: Modal combines sandboxes, training, inference, batch, and notebooks in one platform, which reduces cross-vendor integration work for RL loops.
  • Compliance posture narrows the field: Modal has successfully completed a SOC 2 Type 2 audit and supports HIPAA-compliant workloads on Enterprise plans via a Business Associate Agreement.
  • Availability stages differ across the market: CoreWeave Sandboxes and W&B Serverless Sandboxes are in public preview, and Azure Container Apps Sandboxes is in preview and early access.

1. Modal

Modal delivers an AI infrastructure platform where sandboxes, training, inference, batch processing, and notebooks coexist in a single code-first environment. For RL workloads specifically, Modal places sandbox execution and GPU training infrastructure on the same platform, which reduces cross-vendor integration overhead between environment rollouts and policy updates.

Key Capabilities

  • Large-scale parallelization: Modal's engineering team states the platform supports up to 50,000 concurrent Sandboxes per customer, and its Sandboxes product page positions the product at 100,000+ concurrent scale. Modal separately reports an engineering demonstration of one million concurrent Sandboxes created in under one minute.
  • gVisor isolation by default: Modal's default Sandbox runtime uses gVisor, which Modal describes as providing stronger protection than most container runtimes while remaining performance-competitive. Full-VM Sandboxes are available as an alternative runtime.
  • CPU and GPU compute: Elastic access to GPU accelerators including H100, H200, A100, B200, B300, L40S, L4, A10, T4, and RTX PRO 6000, alongside CPU-only Sandboxes for environment logic that does not need an accelerator.
  • Fast cold starts: Engineered for fast cold starts and faster feedback loops, with an optimized filesystem that helps containers come online quickly without letting large images slow startup down. Memory snapshotting further shortens the path from scheduling to a ready environment, and configurable readiness probes let teams define when an application is ready to serve.
  • Any language inside the Sandbox: Code running inside a Modal Sandbox is not limited to one programming language; the Sandbox runs whatever runtime the workload requires. Sandbox operations themselves are available through Modal SDKs in Python, TypeScript, and Go.
  • Snapshotting for checkpointing: Filesystem and Directory Snapshots persist and clone Sandbox state. Directory Snapshots let teams snapshot only part of a Sandbox, such as separating user project files from platform-owned dependencies, and can be mounted after a Sandbox has started, which supports patterns like attaching project-specific state to pre-warmed Sandboxes. Full Memory Snapshots are currently in Alpha with documented usage guidance.
  • Enterprise security: Modal has successfully completed a SOC 2 Type 2 audit with no deviations found, and supports HIPAA-compliant workloads on Enterprise plans via a Business Associate Agreement. HIPAA has no officially recognized certification process.

Why It Leads for RL

Modal's architecture addresses the core challenge of tool-use RL: running many concurrent trajectories while keeping GPU utilization high. The platform has customer evidence directly in this shape. Applied Compute runs thousands of Modal Sandboxes in parallel during RL training and connects Sandbox startup latency directly to idle inference-GPU time, and Applied Compute said Modal was the only option among the providers it evaluated that supplied appropriate primitives across its RL loop while keeping the boundaries between them low-cost. On the production-agent side, Lovable reached up to 20,000 concurrent Sandboxes at peak during a 48-hour promotional weekend in which Modal ran more than one million Sandboxes, and Modal Sandboxes now serve every Lovable app-generation session. Ramp uses Modal to power Inspect, its internal background coding agent, which has scaled to hundreds of concurrent sessions with a full-stack development environment inside each Sandbox. The code-first SDK means RL researchers define environments, reward functions, and training loops in normal application code without YAML configuration or Kubernetes manifests, with composable primitives that specify logic and hardware in one place and a developer experience Modal describes as feeling local. Modal routes workloads across clouds and regions automatically, with explicit region selection available when placement matters, and region pinning holds the chosen region rather than silently scheduling elsewhere. Best For: Teams that want CPU and GPU sandbox execution, large-scale parallel rollouts, integrated training and inference, and enterprise compliance artifacts in one code-first stack.

2. Daytona

Daytona provides a sandbox platform that supports cold starts, with multi-language SDK support spanning Python, TypeScript, Ruby, Go, and Java. The platform publishes RL-specific documentation and customer material, including guides for launching thousands of environment instances.

Key Capabilities

  • Container-based isolation with optional VM classes: Current architecture documentation describes sandboxes running as Linux containers by default, each with its own Linux namespaces for processes, networking, filesystem mounts, and IPC, with additional Linux VM, Windows, and GPU sandbox classes available, so the applicable isolation boundary depends on the selected sandbox class.
  • Unlimited session duration: Sandbox TTL can be disabled by setting it to zero, and Daytona describes unlimited persistence.
  • Source-available history, private current core: Daytona's public GitHub repository notes that core development moved to a private codebase as of June 2026. It showed approximately 72,000 stars when checked on July 22, 2026.
  • GPU support: GPU snapshot options currently include H100, H200, RTX PRO 6000, RTX 4090, and RTX 5090.
  • Claude integration: Daytona provides an implementation guide for running Claude Managed Agents with Daytona sandboxes.

RL-Specific Strengths

Daytona's provisioning model is aimed at the RL provisioning pattern, and its OpenEnv FinQA reinforcement learning guide documents launching large numbers of environment instances in parallel. Computer Use is available for Linux and Windows, with macOS support currently in private alpha. Named customer material includes LangChain, SambaNova, Turing, and Trajectory. Best For: Teams prioritizing polyglot SDK coverage and high-volume parallel rollouts, with an actively developed core that is now maintained privately.

3. CoreWeave Sandboxes

CoreWeave launched its Sandboxes product on May 14, 2026, explicitly positioned for reinforcement learning, agent tool use, and model evaluation. The differentiator is placement: sandboxes can run in the same CoreWeave environment as GPU training workloads, reducing cross-cloud transfers and network round trips between RL rollouts and policy updates. Availability note: CoreWeave Sandboxes and W&B Serverless Sandboxes are in public preview as of July 2026.

Key Capabilities

  • GPU-capable placement: Sandbox configuration includes GPU resource requests, mounted files, ports, secrets, storage, and timeouts. Sandboxes can run in CoreWeave environments that also provide H100 and B200 compute and HPC interconnect networking, with exact placement and networking depending on cluster configuration.
  • Kubernetes-native: Deploys on CoreWeave Kubernetes Service or through a managed and serverless path via Weights & Biases.
  • Python client: A documented Python client handles session management and storage integration.
  • Explicit RL positioning: The product launch names reinforcement learning, agent tool use, and model evaluation as target workloads.

RL-Specific Strengths

IBM Research reports using the system at meaningful scale: Brian Belgodere, Senior Technical Staff Member at IBM Research, describes RL workflows that spin up thousands of sandboxes in parallel per training step. Mistral separately reports running hundreds of concurrent sandboxes, on CPU nodes alongside Slurm training jobs on GPU nodes. Running sandboxes in the same CoreWeave environment as training workloads can reduce cross-cloud transfers and network round trips. The documented architecture includes a control plane, a data plane, a gateway, managed runners, and Kubernetes pods. Best For: Enterprises already on CoreWeave infrastructure that are comfortable with public-preview support expectations.

4. E2B

E2B offers Firecracker microVM sandboxes focused on code execution for AI agents. Its public material describes broad adoption among large enterprises and more than one billion started sandboxes.

Key Capabilities

  • Firecracker isolation: Each sandbox gets a hardware-virtualized boundary and its own guest environment. Firecracker is also used by AWS Lambda.
  • Sandbox creation: E2B uses prebuilt templates and Firecracker microVMs, and supports cold starts.
  • Code Interpreter SDK: A documented product purpose-built for LLM code execution.
  • Documented scale: Rogo reports 10,000 to 15,000 concurrent sandboxes in production.
  • Enterprise adoption: Hugging Face, Groq, and Manus are named customers.

RL-Specific Strengths

E2B documents reward-function execution for Hugging Face's Open R1 work, and separately reports customer deployments reaching 10,000 to 15,000 concurrent sandboxes. Current public resource and pricing material concerns CPU and RAM, which suits code execution and tool-use evaluation where accelerated work runs on separate training and inference services. Best For: Teams focused on CPU-bound code-execution sandboxes for reward evaluation, where GPU work runs on separate training and inference services.

5. Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) Agent Sandbox

GKE Agent Sandbox provides Kubernetes-native sandbox orchestration for isolated agent code execution and computer use, with native gVisor support and pluggable Kata Containers support.

Key Capabilities

  • Kubernetes-native: Full kubectl and Kubernetes API integration through custom resource definitions including Sandbox, SandboxTemplate, SandboxClaim, and SandboxWarmPool.
  • gVisor with pluggable Kata: gVisor is natively supported, with Kata Containers available through pluggable interfaces. Both provide stronger isolation than ordinary containers, with workload-dependent performance characteristics.
  • Warm pools and snapshots: SandboxWarmPool pre-warms instances, and Pod Snapshots save and restore sandbox environments to improve startup behavior.
  • Default-deny networking: Agent Sandbox applies a default-deny network posture. Organizations can combine it with broader GKE network isolation and VPC Service Controls, subject to each service's support.
  • Inherited GCP capabilities: Deployments can inherit GKE and Google Cloud features such as Workload Identity Federation and Cloud IAM, subject to cluster and workload configuration.

RL-Specific Strengths

For organizations already running GKE clusters, Agent Sandbox provides sandbox primitives without introducing new vendors, and the warm-pool feature helps maintain low latency for workloads requiring rapid environment provisioning. GKE can also host ADK-based agent applications while Agent Sandbox provides isolated execution environments. These components are composable within GKE. Google separately documents using GKE Pod Snapshots to save and restore Agent Sandbox environments and improve startup behavior. Best For: Enterprises with existing GKE infrastructure seeking native sandbox integration and Google Cloud enterprise support.

6. Azure Container Apps Sandboxes (Preview)

Azure Container Apps Sandboxes is a distinct Microsoft.App/SandboxGroups resource type with a user-managed lifecycle, stateful snapshots, and volumes. It is separate from Dynamic Sessions, another Container Apps compute type that provides ephemeral, prewarmed, Hyper-V isolated sessions managed through session pools for code interpretation and LLM-generated scripts. Availability note: Azure Container Apps Sandboxes is in preview and early access. Microsoft notes that sandboxes created during preview might not be compatible with future releases, that resources might need to be recreated, and that API and CLI surfaces may change.

Key Capabilities

  • Stateful snapshots: Full memory-and-disk snapshot support with volumes.
  • Suspend and resume: State preservation across sleep cycles, with configurable memory-or-disk suspend mode.
  • Lifecycle policies: Auto-suspend, suspend mode, and auto-delete.
  • Scale: Documented scaling to thousands of sandboxes.
  • Azure ecosystem integration: Managed identities, Key Vault-based secret access, and Azure Monitor. Application Insights behavior differs between ordinary Container Apps workloads and Foundry Hosted Agents, which have a built-in observability path.

RL-Specific Strengths

Microsoft Foundry Hosted Agents run containerized agentic applications in per-session VM-isolated sandboxes with dedicated persistent filesystems and session state restoration, which demonstrates agent-hosting integration. Microsoft documents its reinforcement fine-tuning service separately. The suspend and resume capability with state preservation enables cost optimization for long-running experiments with intermittent activity. Best For: Microsoft Azure customers requiring native sandbox integration with existing Azure security and compliance controls, at a preview stage of availability.

7. Deno Sandbox

Deno Sandbox launched in 2026, running independent Linux microVMs with hypervisor-level isolation on Deno Deploy, with a distinctive secrets architecture that keeps raw credential values outside the sandbox.

Key Capabilities

  • microVM provisioning: Deno describes spin-up of secure Linux microVMs and supports cold starts.
  • Secret isolation: Secret values stay outside the sandbox; placeholder values exist inside the VM and real values are substituted only on outbound requests to approved hosts, with allowlisted outbound networking.
  • TypeScript-native, plus Python: SDKs for TypeScript/JavaScript and Python.
  • Documented regions: ams (Amsterdam) and ord (Chicago).
  • Compliance: SOC 2 material and an ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate covering the ISMS supporting specified Deno runtime environments, tools, and libraries hosted on AWS.

RL-Specific Strengths

Deno explicitly targets AI agents and copilots that need to run code as they reason. The secrets architecture keeps raw secret values out of the sandbox and substitutes them only for approved destinations, reducing direct credential-exfiltration risk during exploration. Overall credential security also depends on the allowlist, the behavior of approved destinations, application protocols, and the customer's threat model. Current documented sandbox lifetimes run from seconds to minutes, with a 30-minute limit described in the product limits, and the current resource model documents CPU and memory. That profile suits lightweight tool-use evaluation more than full RL training loops. Best For: TypeScript and JavaScript focused teams building lightweight tool-use agents with strict secret-isolation requirements.

Why Modal Stands Out for Tool-Use RL

Integrated Infrastructure Reduces Assembly Work

Modal places sandboxes, GPU training, inference serving, storage, and orchestration primitives on one platform. For RL workflows this reduces cross-vendor integration overhead and the number of moving parts between policy updates, environment rollouts, and reward computation. Teams can tighten latency between separately running components further through region selection and architecture choices. Ramp, for example, achieved no network hop between the agent and its test suite by placing both inside a single Sandbox, while using Functions, Dicts, and Queues for coordination outside it.

Elastic Compute Without Reservation Complexity

RL training requires compute that scales with experiment size. Modal provides elastic access to CPU and GPU resources, including H100, H200, A100, B200, B300, and other accelerators, through a multi-cloud capacity pool without customer-managed quotas or reservations. Sandboxes are billed by CPU and memory consumption by the second, and teams can tune requested CPU and memory, with bursting available above the requested amount, so Sandboxes can be sized to the workload.

Production-Proven and Demonstrated at Scale

Modal states it supports up to 50,000 concurrent Sandboxes per customer and has demonstrated one million concurrent Sandboxes created in under one minute in an engineering demonstration. On the customer side, Applied Compute runs thousands of Sandboxes in parallel during RL training, and Lovable reached a production peak of 20,000 concurrent Sandboxes during a promotional weekend. Together these are directly relevant evidence for the parallelization demands of serious RL research.

Enterprise Compliance for Regulated Industries

Modal has successfully completed a SOC 2 Type 2 audit with no deviations found, and supports HIPAA-compliant workloads on Enterprise plans via a Business Associate Agreement.

Code-First Developer Experience

RL researchers work in code, not configuration. Modal's SDKs support code-defined infrastructure in Python, TypeScript, and Go, letting teams specify everything from logic to hardware in one place, without YAML configuration, Kubernetes manifests, or Terraform scripts. Code inside the Sandbox is not limited to one language either, so environments can run whatever runtime the workload requires. Modal also provides integrated logging and visibility into every function, sandbox, and container, including log export, so the same workflow supports debugging and production operation. For teams building tool-use RL systems that need CPU and GPU compute, large-scale parallelization, and enterprise compliance artifacts, Modal provides an unusually complete infrastructure stack. Explore the sandboxes documentation to understand implementation details.

Explore the sandboxes documentation to understand implementation details.

View Sandboxes Docs

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes a sandbox suitable for tool-use RL environments?

Tool-use RL requires sandboxes that can execute arbitrary code safely (strong isolation), scale to large numbers of concurrent instances (parallelization), and integrate cleanly with training infrastructure (low operational and network overhead). GPU support inside the sandbox becomes relevant when environment-side models or accelerated workloads must run there; many RL architectures instead run CPU-bound environment logic in sandboxes with policy inference and training on separate GPU services. Platforms like Modal cover both patterns in one stack, across CPU and GPU compute.

How does isolation technology affect RL sandbox security?

Firecracker microVMs (E2B) and hypervisor-isolated Linux microVMs (Deno) give each sandbox its own guest environment and a virtualization boundary. gVisor, used by Modal and GKE, adds a userspace-kernel isolation layer, which Modal describes as stronger than most container runtimes. Kata Containers, available through GKE's pluggable interfaces, combines VM-level security with container ergonomics, while Daytona uses namespace-isolated Linux containers by default with VM classes available. For untrusted code execution in RL, where agents explore unpredictable actions, microVM or gVisor isolation provides appropriate security boundaries.

Why does cold start time matter for reinforcement learning?

RL training often launches many environment instances per training step, so provisioning behavior affects wall-clock time. The arithmetic depends on whether launches are parallel or serialized. With sufficient capacity, truly parallel startup adds roughly the slowest instance's startup latency to the critical path rather than the sum of all startup times. In practice, total time depends on provisioning throughput, quotas, queueing, warm pools, image distribution, and batching, and most platforms in this guide document parallel creation, which is why multiplying per-instance latency by rollout count overstates the effect. Modal is engineered for fast cold starts and faster feedback loops, with an optimized filesystem that helps containers come online quickly without letting large images slow startup down.

Can these sandboxes support real-time RL training loops?

For tight RL feedback loops, placement matters. Modal and CoreWeave both let sandboxes run in the same environment as GPU training infrastructure, which can reduce cross-cloud transfers and round trips. GKE and Azure let customers deploy sandbox and model components within the same cloud ecosystem, and actual placement and latency depend on cluster, region, network, and service configuration.

What compliance standards are relevant for AI agent sandboxes?

A SOC 2 Type II report is an independent attestation covering the design and operating effectiveness of specified controls over a defined review period, not technically a certification. Modal has completed a SOC 2 Type 2 audit and supports HIPAA-compliant workloads on Enterprise plans via a Business Associate Agreement; HIPAA itself has no officially recognized certification process. ISO/IEC 27001 addresses an organization's information security management system, is globally applicable rather than Europe-specific, and does not by itself establish data residency in any jurisdiction. Deno publishes an ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate with a scope covering its AWS-hosted runtime environments, tools, and libraries.

Run your first sandbox in minutes.

Get Started Free

$30 in free compute to get started.