Infrastructure
Reinforcement learning is reshaping AI development, but training agents demands more than raw GPU power. It requires secure, scalable sandbox environments where thousands of concurrent rollouts can execute safely without compromising production systems. Sandbox startup, throughput, reliability, and integration overhead can materially affect RL experiment iteration time, particularly at high rollout concurrency, which makes sandbox infrastructure a real architectural decision rather than a commodity purchase. The number of sandbox products targeting AI-agent execution and RL-adjacent workloads expanded substantially in 2025 and 2026, and several offerings are currently available in preview. Platforms now advertise massive parallelization for reward function evaluation, accelerated training loops, and enterprise-grade isolation for untrusted code execution. This guide evaluates seven sandbox platforms that can support tool-use RL environment execution, including several general-purpose agent or code-execution products alongside RL-specific infrastructure. It starts with Modal, which combines secure sandboxes, training, inference, batch processing, and notebooks in one code-first platform.

Modal delivers an AI infrastructure platform where sandboxes, training, inference, batch processing, and notebooks coexist in a single code-first environment. For RL workloads specifically, Modal places sandbox execution and GPU training infrastructure on the same platform, which reduces cross-vendor integration overhead between environment rollouts and policy updates.
Modal's architecture addresses the core challenge of tool-use RL: running many concurrent trajectories while keeping GPU utilization high. The platform has customer evidence directly in this shape. Applied Compute runs thousands of Modal Sandboxes in parallel during RL training and connects Sandbox startup latency directly to idle inference-GPU time, and Applied Compute said Modal was the only option among the providers it evaluated that supplied appropriate primitives across its RL loop while keeping the boundaries between them low-cost. On the production-agent side, Lovable reached up to 20,000 concurrent Sandboxes at peak during a 48-hour promotional weekend in which Modal ran more than one million Sandboxes, and Modal Sandboxes now serve every Lovable app-generation session. Ramp uses Modal to power Inspect, its internal background coding agent, which has scaled to hundreds of concurrent sessions with a full-stack development environment inside each Sandbox. The code-first SDK means RL researchers define environments, reward functions, and training loops in normal application code without YAML configuration or Kubernetes manifests, with composable primitives that specify logic and hardware in one place and a developer experience Modal describes as feeling local. Modal routes workloads across clouds and regions automatically, with explicit region selection available when placement matters, and region pinning holds the chosen region rather than silently scheduling elsewhere. Best For: Teams that want CPU and GPU sandbox execution, large-scale parallel rollouts, integrated training and inference, and enterprise compliance artifacts in one code-first stack.
Daytona provides a sandbox platform that supports cold starts, with multi-language SDK support spanning Python, TypeScript, Ruby, Go, and Java. The platform publishes RL-specific documentation and customer material, including guides for launching thousands of environment instances.
Daytona's provisioning model is aimed at the RL provisioning pattern, and its OpenEnv FinQA reinforcement learning guide documents launching large numbers of environment instances in parallel. Computer Use is available for Linux and Windows, with macOS support currently in private alpha. Named customer material includes LangChain, SambaNova, Turing, and Trajectory. Best For: Teams prioritizing polyglot SDK coverage and high-volume parallel rollouts, with an actively developed core that is now maintained privately.
CoreWeave launched its Sandboxes product on May 14, 2026, explicitly positioned for reinforcement learning, agent tool use, and model evaluation. The differentiator is placement: sandboxes can run in the same CoreWeave environment as GPU training workloads, reducing cross-cloud transfers and network round trips between RL rollouts and policy updates. Availability note: CoreWeave Sandboxes and W&B Serverless Sandboxes are in public preview as of July 2026.
IBM Research reports using the system at meaningful scale: Brian Belgodere, Senior Technical Staff Member at IBM Research, describes RL workflows that spin up thousands of sandboxes in parallel per training step. Mistral separately reports running hundreds of concurrent sandboxes, on CPU nodes alongside Slurm training jobs on GPU nodes. Running sandboxes in the same CoreWeave environment as training workloads can reduce cross-cloud transfers and network round trips. The documented architecture includes a control plane, a data plane, a gateway, managed runners, and Kubernetes pods. Best For: Enterprises already on CoreWeave infrastructure that are comfortable with public-preview support expectations.
E2B offers Firecracker microVM sandboxes focused on code execution for AI agents. Its public material describes broad adoption among large enterprises and more than one billion started sandboxes.
E2B documents reward-function execution for Hugging Face's Open R1 work, and separately reports customer deployments reaching 10,000 to 15,000 concurrent sandboxes. Current public resource and pricing material concerns CPU and RAM, which suits code execution and tool-use evaluation where accelerated work runs on separate training and inference services. Best For: Teams focused on CPU-bound code-execution sandboxes for reward evaluation, where GPU work runs on separate training and inference services.
GKE Agent Sandbox provides Kubernetes-native sandbox orchestration for isolated agent code execution and computer use, with native gVisor support and pluggable Kata Containers support.
For organizations already running GKE clusters, Agent Sandbox provides sandbox primitives without introducing new vendors, and the warm-pool feature helps maintain low latency for workloads requiring rapid environment provisioning. GKE can also host ADK-based agent applications while Agent Sandbox provides isolated execution environments. These components are composable within GKE. Google separately documents using GKE Pod Snapshots to save and restore Agent Sandbox environments and improve startup behavior. Best For: Enterprises with existing GKE infrastructure seeking native sandbox integration and Google Cloud enterprise support.
Azure Container Apps Sandboxes is a distinct Microsoft.App/SandboxGroups resource type with a user-managed lifecycle, stateful snapshots, and volumes. It is separate from Dynamic Sessions, another Container Apps compute type that provides ephemeral, prewarmed, Hyper-V isolated sessions managed through session pools for code interpretation and LLM-generated scripts.
Availability note: Azure Container Apps Sandboxes is in preview and early access. Microsoft notes that sandboxes created during preview might not be compatible with future releases, that resources might need to be recreated, and that API and CLI surfaces may change.
Microsoft Foundry Hosted Agents run containerized agentic applications in per-session VM-isolated sandboxes with dedicated persistent filesystems and session state restoration, which demonstrates agent-hosting integration. Microsoft documents its reinforcement fine-tuning service separately. The suspend and resume capability with state preservation enables cost optimization for long-running experiments with intermittent activity. Best For: Microsoft Azure customers requiring native sandbox integration with existing Azure security and compliance controls, at a preview stage of availability.
Deno Sandbox launched in 2026, running independent Linux microVMs with hypervisor-level isolation on Deno Deploy, with a distinctive secrets architecture that keeps raw credential values outside the sandbox.
ams (Amsterdam) and ord (Chicago).Deno explicitly targets AI agents and copilots that need to run code as they reason. The secrets architecture keeps raw secret values out of the sandbox and substitutes them only for approved destinations, reducing direct credential-exfiltration risk during exploration. Overall credential security also depends on the allowlist, the behavior of approved destinations, application protocols, and the customer's threat model. Current documented sandbox lifetimes run from seconds to minutes, with a 30-minute limit described in the product limits, and the current resource model documents CPU and memory. That profile suits lightweight tool-use evaluation more than full RL training loops. Best For: TypeScript and JavaScript focused teams building lightweight tool-use agents with strict secret-isolation requirements.
Modal places sandboxes, GPU training, inference serving, storage, and orchestration primitives on one platform. For RL workflows this reduces cross-vendor integration overhead and the number of moving parts between policy updates, environment rollouts, and reward computation. Teams can tighten latency between separately running components further through region selection and architecture choices. Ramp, for example, achieved no network hop between the agent and its test suite by placing both inside a single Sandbox, while using Functions, Dicts, and Queues for coordination outside it.
RL training requires compute that scales with experiment size. Modal provides elastic access to CPU and GPU resources, including H100, H200, A100, B200, B300, and other accelerators, through a multi-cloud capacity pool without customer-managed quotas or reservations. Sandboxes are billed by CPU and memory consumption by the second, and teams can tune requested CPU and memory, with bursting available above the requested amount, so Sandboxes can be sized to the workload.
Modal states it supports up to 50,000 concurrent Sandboxes per customer and has demonstrated one million concurrent Sandboxes created in under one minute in an engineering demonstration. On the customer side, Applied Compute runs thousands of Sandboxes in parallel during RL training, and Lovable reached a production peak of 20,000 concurrent Sandboxes during a promotional weekend. Together these are directly relevant evidence for the parallelization demands of serious RL research.
Modal has successfully completed a SOC 2 Type 2 audit with no deviations found, and supports HIPAA-compliant workloads on Enterprise plans via a Business Associate Agreement.
RL researchers work in code, not configuration. Modal's SDKs support code-defined infrastructure in Python, TypeScript, and Go, letting teams specify everything from logic to hardware in one place, without YAML configuration, Kubernetes manifests, or Terraform scripts. Code inside the Sandbox is not limited to one language either, so environments can run whatever runtime the workload requires. Modal also provides integrated logging and visibility into every function, sandbox, and container, including log export, so the same workflow supports debugging and production operation. For teams building tool-use RL systems that need CPU and GPU compute, large-scale parallelization, and enterprise compliance artifacts, Modal provides an unusually complete infrastructure stack. Explore the sandboxes documentation to understand implementation details.
Explore the sandboxes documentation to understand implementation details.
View Sandboxes DocsTool-use RL requires sandboxes that can execute arbitrary code safely (strong isolation), scale to large numbers of concurrent instances (parallelization), and integrate cleanly with training infrastructure (low operational and network overhead). GPU support inside the sandbox becomes relevant when environment-side models or accelerated workloads must run there; many RL architectures instead run CPU-bound environment logic in sandboxes with policy inference and training on separate GPU services. Platforms like Modal cover both patterns in one stack, across CPU and GPU compute.
Firecracker microVMs (E2B) and hypervisor-isolated Linux microVMs (Deno) give each sandbox its own guest environment and a virtualization boundary. gVisor, used by Modal and GKE, adds a userspace-kernel isolation layer, which Modal describes as stronger than most container runtimes. Kata Containers, available through GKE's pluggable interfaces, combines VM-level security with container ergonomics, while Daytona uses namespace-isolated Linux containers by default with VM classes available. For untrusted code execution in RL, where agents explore unpredictable actions, microVM or gVisor isolation provides appropriate security boundaries.
RL training often launches many environment instances per training step, so provisioning behavior affects wall-clock time. The arithmetic depends on whether launches are parallel or serialized. With sufficient capacity, truly parallel startup adds roughly the slowest instance's startup latency to the critical path rather than the sum of all startup times. In practice, total time depends on provisioning throughput, quotas, queueing, warm pools, image distribution, and batching, and most platforms in this guide document parallel creation, which is why multiplying per-instance latency by rollout count overstates the effect. Modal is engineered for fast cold starts and faster feedback loops, with an optimized filesystem that helps containers come online quickly without letting large images slow startup down.
For tight RL feedback loops, placement matters. Modal and CoreWeave both let sandboxes run in the same environment as GPU training infrastructure, which can reduce cross-cloud transfers and round trips. GKE and Azure let customers deploy sandbox and model components within the same cloud ecosystem, and actual placement and latency depend on cluster, region, network, and service configuration.
A SOC 2 Type II report is an independent attestation covering the design and operating effectiveness of specified controls over a defined review period, not technically a certification. Modal has completed a SOC 2 Type 2 audit and supports HIPAA-compliant workloads on Enterprise plans via a Business Associate Agreement; HIPAA itself has no officially recognized certification process. ISO/IEC 27001 addresses an organization's information security management system, is globally applicable rather than Europe-specific, and does not by itself establish data residency in any jurisdiction. Deno publishes an ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate with a scope covering its AWS-hosted runtime environments, tools, and libraries.