Infrastructure
SWE-bench has become the standard benchmark for evaluating coding agents, measuring their ability to resolve real GitHub issues autonomously. But running these agents at scale requires more than raw compute. It demands secure sandboxed environments that can execute AI-generated code safely, scale to thousands of concurrent sessions, and provide the observability needed to debug agent behavior.

SWE-bench has become the standard benchmark for evaluating coding agents, measuring their ability to resolve real GitHub issues autonomously. But running these agents at scale requires more than raw compute. It demands secure sandboxed environments that can execute AI-generated code safely, scale to thousands of concurrent sessions, and provide the observability needed to debug agent behavior. Choosing the right sandbox platform determines whether your coding agents can iterate rapidly on benchmark improvements or get stuck in infrastructure bottlenecks. This guide examines seven sandbox platforms serving different coding agent needs in 2026, starting with Modal, which has upstreamed support into SWE-bench and runs the 500-task Verified benchmark in just 7 minutes.
--modal flag that completes 500 tasks in 7 minutesModal delivers serverless compute for secure code execution at scale, with official SWE-bench integration that makes it the purpose-built choice for coding agent development. The platform's custom infrastructure handles containerization, execution, and automatic scaling. Modal's code-first SDK supports Python, TypeScript, and Go for working with Functions, Sandboxes, and other Modal resources. Code running inside a sandbox is not limited to any single language; the sandbox can run whatever runtime or language the workload requires.
--modal flagModal maintains SOC 2 Type II certification and supports HIPAA-compliant workloads on Enterprise plans via a BAA. The platform uses gVisor-based sandboxing for compute isolation, TLS 1.3 for public APIs, and encryption for data in transit and at rest. See Modal's security docs for full details.
Modal powers production workloads for AI companies building coding agents:
--modal flag to run evaluations in the cloud and complete the 500-task Verified benchmark in 7 minutesBest For: Teams building SWE-bench-style coding agents that need official benchmark integration, production-scale execution, and on-demand GPU access when ML workloads require acceleration.
Northflank provides a full production application platform with flexible isolation options and self-serve bring-your-own-cloud (BYOC) deployment. The platform self-reports handling over 2 million microVMs monthly and offers unlimited session lengths without the continuous-runtime caps found on other platforms.
Northflank maintains SOC 2 Type 2 certification and provides comprehensive compliance controls for regulated industries. The BYOC model enables data sovereignty requirements without sacrificing platform capabilities.
Northflank positions itself as a complete infrastructure stack: sandboxes plus databases, APIs, CI/CD, and observability in one control plane. This breadth benefits teams that want unified infrastructure management beyond isolated code execution.
Best For: Enterprise teams requiring BYOC deployment, flexible isolation options, or unlimited session lengths for extended benchmark runs.
E2B specializes in secure sandboxes for AI agents, focusing on ephemeral code execution with Firecracker microVM isolation. The platform states it is used by 94% of Fortune 100 companies for agentic workflows, with users including Perplexity, Hugging Face, and Groq.
E2B excels at secure code execution, spinning up isolated environments for agents to run generated code. The platform's SDK-first approach makes integration straightforward for teams building custom agent frameworks.
E2B supports ephemeral sandbox execution as well as pause/resume workflows with persistent sandbox state. Each sandbox gets a dedicated kernel through Firecracker, providing hardware-enforced isolation between workloads.
Best For: Teams building coding agents that need secure isolated code execution, whether ephemeral or stateful via pause/resume, where GPU acceleration is not required, particularly those valuing open-source flexibility.
Blaxel is a sandbox platform built specifically for AI agents, emphasizing standby persistence and resume capabilities. The platform supports resume from standby, reducing the overhead of returning to an active state compared to full cold starts.
Blaxel maintains SOC 2 Type II certification, ISO 27001, and offers HIPAA BAA for healthcare workloads, positioning it for enterprise deployments with stringent compliance requirements.
Blaxel treats sandboxes as persistent "agent computers" rather than ephemeral execution environments. This model benefits coding agents that maintain context across multi-day workflows, preserving shell history, installed dependencies, and execution state.
Best For: Teams building coding agents that require state persistence across sessions, standby resume support, and extended standby on higher tiers.
Runloop provides coding agent devbox infrastructure with a unique focus on integrated benchmarking. The platform includes built-in SWE-Bench benchmarking capabilities covering Verified, SWE-Smith, and R2E-Gym benchmarks.
Runloop uses isolated microVM-backed Devboxes and supports snapshot-based branching, providing strong security boundaries while maintaining the developer experience of container-based workflows.
The platform's integrated benchmarking makes it particularly suited for teams systematically evaluating coding agent improvements. Snapshot branching enables A/B testing different agent configurations against the same baseline.
Best For: Teams focused on systematic SWE-bench evaluation and agent improvement, particularly those needing integrated benchmark automation and snapshot-based experimentation.
Daytona provides persistent development environments with multi-language SDK support spanning Python, TypeScript, Ruby, Go, and Java, offering broader language coverage than most competitors offering one or two SDKs.
Daytona describes its sandboxes as isolated, full Linux environments with a dedicated kernel, filesystem, network stack, and OCI/Docker compatibility, making it accessible for teams with existing container-based workflows.
Daytona's strength lies in developer experience: LSP support, IDE integrations, and multi-language SDKs make it accessible for teams with diverse technology stacks building coding agents.
Best For: Polyglot teams building coding agents that prioritize IDE integration and developer experience, particularly those with existing container-based workflows.
Fly.io Sprites provides persistent Firecracker VMs with idle-based billing. No compute charges when sandboxes are inactive, though persistent storage continues to be billed. The platform includes a 100GB durable root filesystem backed by object storage, with NVMe used for active caching, and live checkpoint and restore support.
Fly.io Sprites focuses on individual developer workflows and cost efficiency. The idle billing model particularly benefits coding agent development where usage is intermittent rather than continuous.
The combination of durable storage, idle billing, and checkpoint/restore support makes Fly.io Sprites well-suited for individual developers iterating on coding agents without the overhead of always-on infrastructure costs.
Best For: Individual developers and small teams building coding agents with sporadic usage patterns who prioritize cost efficiency and persistent storage.
Modal has upstreamed support into the SWE-bench framework. Adding a --modal flag lets teams run evaluations in the cloud, execute tests in parallel, and complete the 500-task Verified benchmark in 7 minutes, with no custom infrastructure setup required.
Modal's architecture is specifically engineered for AI workloads. The platform's custom container runtime, scheduler, and file system are optimized for the unique demands of coding agents: fast cold starts, secure code execution, dynamic scaling, and GPU access when ML workloads require it.
Modal powers cloud infrastructure for over 10,000 teams, including AI companies running production coding agent workloads. Ramp uses Modal to power Ramp Inspect, its internal background coding agent, scaling to hundreds of concurrent Sandbox sessions. Lovable ran over 1 million sandboxes in 48 hours, reaching 20,000 concurrent sandboxes at peak. This production track record demonstrates reliability that prototype-stage platforms cannot match.
Most coding-agent work is CPU-based execution of the code the agent writes, and Modal's sandboxes handle this at 50,000+ concurrent sessions with gVisor isolation and full observability. For coding agents that generate and execute untrusted code autonomously, this combination of scale and security is valuable for teams that need parallel execution at production volumes.
Modal combines secure code execution with on-demand GPU access in the same platform. When coding agents need to run ML models for code understanding, generation, or analysis, they can call upon GPUs including B200, H200, H100, RTX PRO 6000, A100 80 GB, A100 40 GB, L40S, A10, L4, and T4, without switching platforms or managing separate infrastructure.
Modal's code-first SDK eliminates YAML configuration overhead, with support for Python, TypeScript, and Go across Sandboxes, Functions, and Modal resources. Teams define compute, images, and scaling in code. This approach enables rapid iteration, critical when you're running hundreds of benchmark variations to improve agent performance.
With SOC 2 Type II certification, HIPAA support via BAA, and comprehensive security practices including gVisor sandboxing and TLS 1.3, Modal meets the compliance requirements that enterprise coding agent deployments demand.
For teams building SWE-bench-style coding agents, Modal's combination of official benchmark integration, AI-native infrastructure, production-proven scale, and enterprise compliance makes it the clear choice.
Explore the Modal documentation to get started with coding agent sandboxes.
Explore the Modal documentation to get started with coding agent sandboxes.
View Modal DocsSWE-bench-style coding agents are AI systems evaluated on their ability to resolve real GitHub issues autonomously. The SWE-bench benchmark presents agents with actual issue descriptions from open-source repositories, and agents must generate code changes that pass the repository's test suite. This evaluation approach has become the standard for measuring practical coding agent capabilities beyond synthetic benchmarks.
Coding agents generate and execute code autonomously without human review of each execution. This creates security requirements that general-purpose compute environments struggle to meet. Specialized sandboxes provide isolation (preventing generated code from affecting other workloads), observability (monitoring what agents actually execute), and controlled resource access (limiting network, filesystem, and compute boundaries). Modal uses gVisor-based sandboxing to isolate compute jobs while supporting 50,000+ concurrent sessions.
Sandbox platforms use different isolation technologies with varying security properties. Modal employs gVisor containers that intercept system calls and provide a virtualized Linux kernel. E2B uses Firecracker microVMs with hardware-level isolation and dedicated kernels per sandbox. Northflank offers a choice of Kata Containers, Firecracker, or gVisor depending on workload requirements. The stronger the isolation boundary, the lower the risk that malicious or buggy generated code can escape the sandbox.
Yes. Modal's code-first SDK supports Python, TypeScript, and Go, enabling programmatic sandbox creation and execution that integrates with standard CI/CD workflows. Teams can trigger benchmark runs, collect results, and track agent performance metrics as part of automated pipelines. The continuous deployment guide covers integration patterns for automated workflows.
Costs vary significantly based on usage patterns. Modal's scale-to-zero architecture charges only for compute used or requested, eliminating idle capacity costs. Fly.io Sprites charges no compute while idle, though persistent storage continues to be billed. For sporadic development usage, these models typically cost less than reserved or always-on infrastructure. For continuous benchmark runs, the total compute used drives costs regardless of billing model.
Modal combines several capabilities suited to coding agents: official SWE-bench integration for benchmark evaluation, gVisor isolation for secure execution of generated code, 50,000+ concurrent sessions for parallel benchmark runs, and on-demand GPU access when agents need ML inference. The platform's custom AI-native runtime optimizes for fast cold starts and dynamic scaling that coding agent workloads require.