Infrastructure
AI applications that execute code in real-time, from coding agents to LLM-powered interpreters, require secure, scalable infrastructure that can handle unpredictable workloads. Streaming code execution presents unique challenges: untrusted AI-generated code must run in isolated environments, scale instantly to meet demand, and deliver results with minimal latency. Choosing the right sandbox platform determines whether your AI application can execute code safely, handle concurrent sessions at scale, and access GPU acceleration when ML workloads require it.

AI applications that execute code in real-time, from coding agents to LLM-powered interpreters, require secure, scalable infrastructure that can handle unpredictable workloads. Streaming code execution presents unique challenges: untrusted AI-generated code must run in isolated environments, scale instantly to meet demand, and deliver results with minimal latency. Choosing the right sandbox platform determines whether your AI application can execute code safely, handle concurrent sessions at scale, and access GPU acceleration when ML workloads require it. This guide examines seven sandbox platforms for streaming code execution in 2026, starting with Modal, a serverless compute platform that combines secure code execution at massive scale with GPU-enabled sandbox environments.
Modal delivers serverless compute infrastructure purpose-built for AI workloads, with secure sandboxes that handle streaming code execution at massive scale. The platform combines gVisor-based isolation with GPU-enabled sandboxes, letting teams run untrusted code securely and attach GPUs for ML workloads in the same Modal environment.
Modal has successfully completed a SOC 2 Type 2 audit, with the report available through its Security Portal, and Modal supports HIPAA-compliant workloads on Enterprise plans via a Business Associate Agreement. The platform's security architecture includes gVisor-based sandboxing for compute isolation, TLS 1.3 for public APIs, and encryption for data at rest and in transit.
Modal powers cloud infrastructure for over 10,000 teams, including companies running production coding agents:
Best For: Teams building AI applications that need secure code execution at scale, with on-demand GPU access for ML inference, model fine-tuning, or compute-intensive analysis alongside code generation.
E2B provides secure sandboxes built specifically for AI agents, using Firecracker microVM isolation. E2B self-reports Fortune 100 adoption, with its homepage currently stating 94% (some E2B docs show 88%). Its open-source repository has approximately 12.6k+ GitHub stars.
E2B excels at ephemeral code execution patterns, spinning up isolated environments for AI agents to run generated code, then tearing them down. The platform is purpose-built for agent workflows, with SDKs designed for rapid integration with popular LLM frameworks.
Best For: Teams building AI agents focused on code execution and testing who prioritize agent framework integrations, particularly for CPU-only workloads.
Northflank offers a full-stack cloud platform with sandboxes as one component, and says it has been running millions of microVMs monthly since 2021. The platform provides multiple isolation technologies and self-serve bring-your-own-cloud (BYOC) deployment across major providers.
Northflank positions sandboxes within a broader platform that includes databases, APIs, and job scheduling. This makes it suitable for teams that need sandboxes alongside other infrastructure components, particularly those with data residency requirements that mandate BYOC deployment.
Best For: Enterprise teams requiring BYOC deployment, multiple isolation technology options, or unlimited session duration for long-running workloads.
Daytona provides persistent development environments and supports sandbox creation for AI workloads. The platform pivoted to AI agent infrastructure in 2025 and has built integrations with LangChain for coding agent workflows.
Daytona uses sysbox-based container isolation, a Docker-compatible container runtime. This provides a familiar containerization model, though the isolation boundaries differ from microVM-based approaches.
Best For: Teams building coding agents that prefer persistent development environments with Docker compatibility.
Blaxel is a perpetual sandbox platform built for AI agents. Blaxel supports resume from standby. The platform focuses on stateful agent environments that maintain context across sessions.
Blaxel emphasizes continuity over ephemeral execution. Sandboxes retain shell history, installed dependencies, and context over time, which benefits agents that need persistent state across workflows rather than clean-room execution on every task.
Best For: Teams building AI agents that require persistent sandbox environments with resume from standby and continuity across sessions.
Vercel Sandbox provisions isolated Firecracker-powered Linux microVM sessions on demand, while sandbox filesystem and configuration state is persistent by default through snapshot and restore. It integrates with the Vercel platform and can be used alongside Next.js applications and the Vercel AI SDK.
Vercel Sandbox is positioned as an execution layer for secure, isolated code running rather than a full infrastructure platform. Its fit is strongest for agent workflows involving repeated start-run-stop cycles or safe execution of generated code within the Vercel ecosystem.
Best For: Teams already using Vercel's infrastructure who need isolated code execution environments for AI agents or development workflows.
Cloudflare Sandbox is powered by Cloudflare Workers and Cloudflare Containers, with user code executing in isolated Linux containers while Workers use V8 isolates for the surrounding serverless runtime. Cloudflare runs a global network across 330+ cities, though sandbox containers are placed according to container-placement rules and request geography rather than executing in every location. The platform is exposed through a TypeScript-first SDK for sandbox lifecycle management.
Cloudflare Sandbox is built on Cloudflare Workers and Containers: user code runs in isolated Linux containers, while Workers provide the surrounding V8-isolate serverless runtime. The platform is geared toward code execution workflows that benefit from global distribution rather than GPU-heavy AI workloads.
Best For: Teams already on Cloudflare that want sandboxed code execution close to users, provided they design around container placement and per-user or per-region sandbox locality.
Modal supports GPU-enabled sandboxes with GPU types from T4 through B200/B200+, so AI applications can run ML inference, fine-tuning, and compute-intensive analysis alongside code execution, a capability that becomes more useful as agents grow more sophisticated. GPU availability varies across providers: Daytona and Northflank also document GPU sandbox types, while E2B has no publicly documented GPU sandbox offering.
Modal's Sandboxes product page advertises 100k+ concurrent sandboxes and over 1 billion sandboxes run. Concurrency limits vary by provider and plan, so direct comparisons depend on the specific platform and tier. This scale is validated by production deployments: Lovable used Modal Sandboxes for every app generation session, ran over 1 million sandboxes during a promotional weekend, and peaked at 20,000 concurrent sandboxes, while Quora uses Modal Sandboxes to securely execute LLM-generated code in Poe and stress-tested Sandbox creation throughput to 1,000 Sandboxes per second.
Modal's custom-built infrastructure, including its file system, container runtime, scheduler, and image builder, is engineered specifically for AI workloads. Memory snapshotting can reduce initialization overhead for suitable workloads (Sandbox memory snapshots are in early preview), and the multi-cloud capacity pool helps with GPU availability.
Modal is code-defined with no YAML configuration, providing code-first SDKs in Python, TypeScript, and Go for sandbox operations and resource management, while sandboxes can run code in any language or runtime the workload requires. Teams define sandbox environments, compute requirements, and scaling behavior directly in code, which enables rapid iteration and makes it possible for LLMs to generate and modify sandbox configurations programmatically.
Modal has successfully completed a SOC 2 Type 2 audit, with the report available through its Security Portal, and Modal supports HIPAA-compliant workloads on Enterprise plans via a Business Associate Agreement. The platform's gVisor-based sandboxing, TLS 1.3 encryption, and documented security practices support enterprise compliance requirements for running AI-generated code at scale. For teams building AI applications that need streaming code execution with GPU acceleration, production-scale concurrency, and enterprise security, Modal's combination of capabilities makes it the clear choice for 2026 and beyond.
Explore the Modal documentation to get started with secure sandboxes for your AI applications.
Check the sandboxes documentation to explore implementation patterns.
View Sandboxes DocsCode execution sandboxing isolates AI-generated code in secure environments where it cannot access host systems, other workloads, or sensitive data. For AI applications that generate and run code autonomously, such as coding agents or LLM-powered interpreters, sandboxing prevents malicious or buggy generated code from causing damage. Platforms like Modal use gVisor-based containers, while E2B and Vercel use Firecracker microVMs for hardware-level isolation.
Streaming code execution means AI-generated code runs in real-time, often without human review. This creates risk: malicious prompts could generate harmful code, or bugs in generated code could affect other systems. Secure sandboxes provide isolation boundaries that contain these risks. Modal's security architecture includes gVisor sandboxing, TLS 1.3 encryption, and a completed SOC 2 Type 2 audit to address enterprise security requirements.
Concurrency and GPU support vary across platforms. Modal's Sandboxes product page advertises 100k+ concurrent sandboxes with GPU-enabled sandboxes spanning T4 through B200/B200+. E2B publishes lower public-plan concurrency limits and has no publicly documented GPU sandbox offering, though other platforms such as Daytona and Northflank do document GPU sandbox types.
For enterprise deployments, look for SOC 2 Type 2, which validates security controls through independent audit. Modal has completed a SOC 2 Type 2 audit and supports HIPAA-compliant workloads on Enterprise plans via a Business Associate Agreement. Data residency controls may also be important for teams with regulatory requirements around where code executes.
Modal combines secure code execution at scale with GPU-enabled sandboxes for ML workloads, so agents can execute generated code securely and run ML inference in the same Modal environment. E2B provides strong agent framework integrations, and Blaxel supports resume from standby. Modal's differentiator is running untrusted code in secure sandboxes with attachable GPUs on a unified platform.
Ephemeral sandboxes are created for a specific task and destroyed afterward, ensuring a clean environment for each execution. Persistent sandboxes maintain state across sessions, preserving installed dependencies, shell history, and context. Modal supports both patterns: ephemeral execution for security-sensitive workloads and filesystem persistence for scenarios requiring continuity. Platforms like Blaxel focus specifically on persistent "perpetual" sandboxes that remain on standby.