Infrastructure
Code execution sandboxes have become essential infrastructure for AI-powered inspection and analysis workflows. OpenInspect-style inspection workflows need secure, isolated environments to run untrusted code, execute automated checks, and scale computational workloads without compromising system integrity. The right sandbox platform determines whether your inspection workflows can handle massive concurrency, maintain security boundaries, and access GPU acceleration when workloads demand it.

This guide examines seven code execution sandbox platforms serving different OpenInspect-style use cases in 2026, starting with Modal, a serverless compute platform built for secure sandboxed execution at scale with GPU support.
Modal delivers serverless compute for secure sandboxed execution at massive scale, the core requirement for OpenInspect-style workflows that run untrusted code. The platform reports 1 billion+ sandboxes run and supports on-demand GPU access for inspection workloads that require ML acceleration.
Modal has completed a SOC 2 Type II audit with no deviations and undergoes annual audits, and supports HIPAA-compliant workloads on Enterprise plans via a BAA. The platform uses gVisor-based sandboxing for compute isolation, TLS 1.3 for public APIs, and encryption for data in transit and at rest. Comprehensive security practices include documented vulnerability remediation timeframes by severity and audited access controls.
Modal powers production sandbox workloads for notable AI companies:
Best For: OpenInspect-style teams that need secure code execution at massive scale, GPU-accelerated inspection models, and a unified platform that handles sandboxes, inference, and batch processing together.
E2B specializes in secure sandboxes for AI agents, focusing on ephemeral code execution with Firecracker microVM isolation. The platform self-reports usage by 94% of Fortune 100 companies. E2B also self-reports 1B+ started sandboxes.
E2B excels at ephemeral code execution, spinning up isolated environments for agents to run generated code, then tearing them down. E2B's Hobby/free tier supports up to 20 concurrently running sandboxes; higher concurrency is available on paid plans.
E2B case studies and customer quotes state that the following companies use E2B for large-scale code execution and agent workflows:
Best For: OpenInspect-style workflows focused on ephemeral code execution and testing where Firecracker-level isolation is the priority and GPU acceleration is not required.
Northflank provides a full-stack infrastructure platform with sandbox capabilities, offering flexible isolation options and bring-your-own-cloud (BYOC) deployment. The platform self-reports running millions of isolated/microVM workloads monthly and supports GPU access alongside CPU sandboxes.
Northflank positions itself as a comprehensive infrastructure platform where sandboxes are one component alongside databases, CI/CD, and application hosting. This approach benefits OpenInspect-style deployments that need sandboxes integrated with broader infrastructure.
The platform documented a case where cto.new migrated their entire sandbox infrastructure in two days, going from unpredictable provisioning to thousands of daily deployments.
Best For: OpenInspect-style teams with strict compliance requirements needing BYOC deployment, or those wanting multiple isolation options per workload type.
CodeSandbox offers microVM-based sandboxes with advanced forking and snapshotting capabilities. A Together AI company, the platform focuses on development-oriented sandbox environments with state management features.
CodeSandbox emphasizes branching and forking workflows, allowing users to snapshot an inspection environment and create parallel branches for testing different code paths or configurations.
CodeSandbox supports snapshot restore and VM or snapshot cloning. This suits workflows where environment setup happens less frequently than code execution.
Best For: OpenInspect-style workflows that benefit from snapshotting and forking capabilities, particularly when testing multiple inspection configurations in parallel.
Fly.io Sprites provides sandbox environments built on Firecracker microVMs with persistent storage options. The platform offers checkpoint and restore capabilities for stateful inspection workflows.
Fly.io Sprites emphasizes persistent development environments that maintain state across sessions. This benefits OpenInspect-style workflows that accumulate cached dependencies or intermediate results over time.
Fly.io Sprites supports cold starts, with checkpoint restore enabling resumption of previously snapshotted states.
Best For: OpenInspect-style deployments that need persistent sandbox storage and checkpoint/restore capabilities for stateful inspection workflows.
RunLoop.ai is purpose-built for AI agent development and benchmarking, with sandbox infrastructure designed around agent acceleration and evaluation workflows.
RunLoop.ai positions itself around agent performance benchmarking and evaluation, making it relevant for OpenInspect-style workflows that assess agent behavior or code generation quality.
The platform provides SDKs for programmatic sandbox control, with configurable runtime persistence and resource allocation per sandbox.
Best For: OpenInspect-style teams focused on agent benchmarking, evaluation workflows, or quality assessment of AI-generated code.
Daytona provides open-source development environment infrastructure with sandbox capabilities. The platform's GitHub repository has accumulated significant community interest, and it offers both self-hosted and managed options.
Daytona focuses on persistent workspaces that maintain state across sessions. Sandboxes preserve context, cached dependencies, and intermediate results without recreation overhead, benefiting inspection workflows that build on previous state.
Standard container image support enables flexible environment configuration using existing Dockerfiles and OCI images.
Best For: OpenInspect-style teams that prefer open-source infrastructure, need self-hosting options, or want persistent development environments with GPU access.
Modal stands out for combining GPU-backed sandbox execution with a unified serverless AI platform, code-first development, and massive sandbox concurrency. Documented GPU options include L4, A100, H100, H200, and B200. For inspection workflows that run ML models for code analysis, vulnerability detection, or automated review, this enables running inference directly within the secure sandbox rather than making external API calls. Several competitors also advertise GPU-capable sandbox or workload infrastructure, so the differentiation should be framed around Modal's platform integration, scale, and developer experience rather than GPU exclusivity. The deep GPU capacity pool across multiple cloud providers helps ensure availability without managing cloud-provider reservations directly.
Modal advertises 100k+ concurrent sandboxes with sub-second scheduling and strong cold-start performance. For deployments processing thousands of inspection jobs simultaneously, this scale helps address infrastructure bottlenecks, with higher concurrency available on Enterprise plans. Companies like Lovable run "tens of thousands of app creation sessions" on Modal's sandbox infrastructure.
Modal Sandboxes work seamlessly with the broader Modal platform, including Volumes for persistent storage, Secrets for credential management, and networking primitives for controlled connectivity. This unified approach means teams manage one platform rather than stitching together separate services for sandboxes, storage, and compute.
Modal's SDKs let teams define sandbox environments directly in code, with code-defined infrastructure available in Python, TypeScript, and Go. Container images, resource requirements, networking rules, and scaling behavior are all specified programmatically without YAML configuration or infrastructure-as-code overhead. Code running inside a sandbox is not limited to one language and can use whatever runtime the workload requires. This code-first approach accelerates iteration for inspection workflow development.
For deployments handling sensitive code or operating in regulated environments, Modal provides SOC 2 Type II audit completion and supports HIPAA-compliant workloads on Enterprise plans via a BAA. The platform's security practices include gVisor-based sandboxing, TLS 1.3 encryption, and documented vulnerability remediation timeframes by severity.
Modal powers cloud infrastructure for over 10,000 teams, including AI companies like Ramp, Lovable, and Applied Compute. This production track record demonstrates the platform's ability to handle enterprise-scale sandbox workloads reliably, reducing operational risk for inspection deployments.
Modal is the strongest fit for OpenInspect-style production workloads when teams need secure sandboxed execution, GPU-backed AI workloads, code-first orchestration, and large-scale serverless infrastructure in one platform. Some competitors provide strong sandbox primitives, but Modal's advantage is the combination of sandbox scale, GPU access, AI infrastructure primitives, and low-operational-overhead deployment.
Explore the Modal documentation to get started with sandboxes for inspection workflows.
Explore the Modal Sandboxes documentation to get started.
View Sandboxes DocsA code execution sandbox is an isolated environment that runs untrusted code without affecting the host system or other workloads. For OpenInspect-style workflows, sandboxes are essential because inspection workflows execute code that may contain vulnerabilities, malicious patterns, or unpredictable behavior. Modal's gVisor-based sandboxing provides secure isolation while advertising 100k+ concurrent sandboxes with sub-second scheduling for production-scale inspection.
Modal uses gVisor containers to isolate compute jobs, with each sandbox having controlled filesystem and network access. The platform has completed a SOC 2 Type II audit, uses TLS 1.3 for all public APIs, encrypts data in transit and at rest, and supports HIPAA-compliant workloads on Enterprise plans via a BAA. Detailed security practices include documented vulnerability remediation timeframes by severity and audited access controls.
Modal supports GPU access inside sandbox environments, with documented options including L4, A100, H100, H200, and B200 NVIDIA GPUs. This enables inspection workflows to run ML models for code analysis, vulnerability detection, or automated review directly within secure sandboxes. Some platforms, including E2B and Fly.io Sprites, primarily market CPU-oriented code execution sandboxes, while other competitors such as Daytona and Northflank also advertise GPU-capable environments.
Modal provides native SDKs in Python, TypeScript, and Go that let you define sandbox environments directly in code. The platform integrates with cloud marketplaces (AWS and GCP) for enterprise procurement, supports OIDC-based authentication with external services, and offers Datadog integration for observability. Sandboxes work seamlessly with Modal Volumes, Secrets, and networking primitives.
gVisor (used by Modal) provides container-based isolation through a user-space kernel that intercepts system calls. Firecracker (used by E2B and Fly.io Sprites) provides hardware-level isolation through lightweight microVMs. Both approaches are designed to run untrusted code securely; they differ mainly in how isolation is implemented rather than in trading performance for security. Modal Sandboxes use gVisor-based isolation and can be configured with GPUs.
Key considerations include security isolation model (gVisor vs. Firecracker), GPU support requirements for ML-powered inspection, concurrency scale needed for production workloads, compliance requirements (SOC 2, HIPAA), and integration with existing infrastructure. Modal addresses these factors with 100k+ concurrent sandbox support with sub-second scheduling, GPU access, enterprise security controls, and a unified platform that reduces operational complexity.