GPU Cloud
For AI teams building inference APIs, training large models, or running massive batch jobs, GPU availability is often the bottleneck. Hyperscalers such as AWS and Google Cloud use GPU or accelerator quotas, and some accounts must request quota increases before launching additional accelerators. Quota approval and physical hardware availability are separate constraints, so access friction can vary by account, region, GPU family, and live capacity. A new generation of GPU cloud infrastructure reduces that friction by offering self-service GPU access without the traditional hyperscaler quota-request workflow or a capacity reservation for ordinary deployments. This guide examines seven GPU cloud providers that offer on-demand GPU access in 2026. It starts with Modal, a serverless AI infrastructure platform that combines fast cold starts, automatic scaling, per-second GPU billing, a code-first developer experience, and broad support for inference, training, batch processing, Sandboxes, and Notebooks. For teams that need elastic GPU compute without managing fleets of GPU virtual machines, Modal is the standout choice.

Modal delivers a serverless GPU platform engineered for AI workloads. Unlike traditional cloud providers that primarily expose GPU-attached virtual machines, Modal provides a code-first execution model in which applications define compute requirements in code and Modal handles containerization, scheduling, scaling, cloud execution, and teardown automatically. Modal supports SDKs and code-defined infrastructure workflows in Python, TypeScript, and Go. Modal Sandboxes can run whatever programming language or runtime a workload requires, making the platform suitable for both model-centric workloads and broader AI application infrastructure.
Modal's architecture differs fundamentally from VM-based GPU clouds. Applications define the compute they need, while Modal manages the underlying infrastructure:
Modal's platform spans the core AI workload lifecycle:
Modal provides serverless access to a broad current GPU catalog through its pooled multi-cloud capacity model, without the conventional hyperscaler quota-request workflow:
Modal maintains enterprise-grade security controls:
Best For: Teams building production AI applications that need elastic GPU access without managing GPU fleets. Modal is particularly strong for inference APIs with variable traffic, distributed training, massively parallel batch processing, GPU-backed experimentation, and AI systems that need secure isolated execution.
Vast.ai operates a distributed GPU marketplace connecting independent compute providers with buyers. Its marketplace spans consumer and data-center GPU options across multiple hosts and locations.
Vast.ai's marketplace model provides access to distributed GPU capacity:
Vast.ai combines marketplace-style instance access with serverless options. Individual listings can differ in hardware configuration, networking, storage, location, and service characteristics, while Secure Cloud provides a data-center-focused service tier. Best For: Teams that want broad GPU selection, marketplace pricing, interruptible capacity, and access to both instance-based and serverless deployment models.
TensorDock explicitly markets "No quotas, no commitments" and operates a global GPU marketplace that aggregates capacity from independent hosts and infrastructure partners.
TensorDock's positioning removes the conventional quota-approval step common in larger clouds:
TensorDock primarily provides VM-style GPU rental. Users can launch self-service instances and manage them directly, with GPU availability varying by model and location. Best For: Teams seeking quota-free, self-service VM-style GPU access through a globally distributed marketplace, with flexible on-demand and longer-term options.
JarvisLabs targets developers, researchers, and small teams with GPU cloud services that include conventional VMs, managed GPU Templates, and serverless endpoints.
JarvisLabs combines VM access with managed development environments and serverless endpoints. Managed Templates support on-demand launches, while traditional VMs provide direct machine control and the serverless product supports variable inference workloads. Best For: Individual researchers and small teams seeking GPU access with managed development environments, per-minute billing, pause and resume workflows, and an optional scale-to-zero serverless path.
Oblivus Cloud provides GPU infrastructure for production workloads, including traditional VM-based services, reserved capacity, dedicated configurations, and marketplace access.
Oblivus targets organizations that want dedicated or reserved GPU infrastructure with enterprise support and configurable deployments. Its data-center pages list facilities associated with certifications and compliance frameworks including ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type 2, and HIPAA. Best For: Enterprise teams that want a mix of traditional VM infrastructure, reserved or dedicated capacity, and marketplace-style GPU discovery.
Thunder Compute uses per-minute GPU pricing with baseline storage included and no data-egress charges.
Thunder Compute uses a direct VM-style GPU model. Baseline storage is bundled with GPU instances, while additional storage and snapshots are separately metered. Best For: Teams, researchers, and eligible students seeking per-minute GPU access with included baseline storage and no egress charges.
Spheron operates an aggregated GPU marketplace that provides a single interface across multiple underlying providers, with bare-metal, spot, and on-demand capacity options.
Spheron separates interruptible spot capacity from dedicated, non-interruptible on-demand GPU instances. Its dedicated on-demand tier includes a published uptime SLA. Best For: Teams that want aggregated bare-metal GPU capacity, root access, per-minute billing, and a choice between spot instances and dedicated on-demand capacity.
Modal's advantage is the breadth and integration of its serverless AI platform. It combines scale-to-zero inference, distributed training, massively parallel batch processing, secure Sandboxes, GPU-backed Notebooks, code-defined infrastructure, and per-second compute billing in one platform. This matters for three reasons:
Modal is engineered for fast cold starts and faster feedback loops. Its optimized filesystem helps containers come online quickly without letting large images slow startup down. For initialization-heavy GPU workloads, GPU Memory Snapshots can restore initialized runtime state so repeated startup work does not need to be recomputed. Together with Modal's container architecture and image system, this supports responsive scaling for inference, experimentation, and other dynamic AI workloads.
Modal uses SDKs and code-defined infrastructure to keep application logic and compute configuration closely connected. Python, TypeScript, and Go are supported for Modal development workflows, and Sandboxes can execute workloads in any programming language or runtime. The Modal introduction describes a development model that avoids requiring teams to manage Kubernetes clusters, GPU VM fleets, or a separate cloud account for normal Modal workloads. This keeps the infrastructure surface area focused on application and model requirements.
Modal's customer examples document production AI deployments across startups, scale-ups, and enterprises. Modal also supports agent-specific production use cases, including the Ramp coding agent architecture built on Modal Sandboxes. That production track record is paired with enterprise controls including audit logs, SSO, a completed SOC 2 Type 2 audit, and support for HIPAA-compliant workloads on Enterprise plans via a BAA.
Modal spans the AI development lifecycle through inference, training, batch processing, Sandboxes, and Notebooks. That breadth lets teams run multiple workload types on one code-first platform instead of maintaining separate infrastructure systems for every stage. For teams evaluating GPU clouds that minimize hyperscaler-style quota friction, Modal's combination of serverless architecture, fast cold starts, fine-grained billing, integrated workload primitives, broad GPU access, and enterprise security makes it the clear choice for production AI workloads with variable demand patterns. Get started with Modal's Starter plan to evaluate the platform.
In this guide, "without quotas or waitlists" means a provider generally lets users access self-service GPU inventory without first completing a hyperscaler-style quota approval or sales-gated capacity request for ordinary deployments. It does not imply that every GPU model is continuously available in every region. AWS uses per-account, per-region On-Demand Instance quotas, and Google Cloud applies GPU quotas to projects. Modal avoids the conventional quota-request workflow for its serverless GPU platform through a pooled multi-cloud capacity model. Marketplace providers similarly expose inventory through self-service interfaces rather than the traditional hyperscaler quota-increase process.
Billing granularity affects how closely infrastructure charges track actual runtime. Modal bills listed GPU resources per second, which is useful for short jobs, bursty inference, experiments, and batch workloads that scale up and down frequently. Billing granularity varies across the other providers. JarvisLabs, Thunder Compute, and Spheron use minute-level billing for relevant GPU services, while other providers use different metering models. Modal's per-second serverless model combines fine-grained metering with automatic scaling and scale-to-zero infrastructure.
High-end 2026 options across the group include NVIDIA H100, H200, B200, and B300-class hardware. Modal pricing lists B300, B200, H200, H100, RTX PRO 6000, A100, L40S, A10, L4, and T4, while the other providers expose different combinations of data-center, professional, and consumer GPUs. A100s remain widely represented across GPU clouds, while lower-cost inference options can include L40S, L40, L4, RTX 4090, RTX A6000, and similar GPUs. Exact inventory depends on the provider, service model, region, and current supply.
Distributed and aggregated GPU marketplaces provide hardware diversity, flexible inventory models, and marketplace pricing structures. Vast.ai provides marketplace access alongside serverless inference, TensorDock aggregates VM capacity from independent hosts, and Spheron combines capacity from multiple providers with spot and dedicated on-demand options. Modal takes a different approach by abstracting the underlying infrastructure behind a serverless execution model. That makes Modal especially well suited to teams that prioritize automatic scaling, code-defined infrastructure, per-second billing, and a unified platform for inference, training, batch, Sandboxes, and Notebooks.
Security and compliance depend on the workload, service tier, and infrastructure model. Marketplace and aggregated-cloud providers can structure controls differently across hosts, facilities, and service tiers. Modal has completed a SOC 2 Type 2 audit, uses gVisor-based isolation, supports enterprise SSO and audit logs, and supports HIPAA-compliant workloads on Enterprise plans via a BAA. These controls are integrated into the same serverless platform used for inference, training, batch processing, Sandboxes, and Notebooks.
Integration models vary across providers. Modal supports SDKs and code-defined infrastructure workflows in Python, TypeScript, and Go. Modal applications can expose HTTP endpoints, and OIDC authentication can provide short-lived identity tokens for external systems such as AWS, GCP, Azure, Vault, and other compatible services. Modal Sandboxes can run any language or runtime required by the workload, which makes them useful for execution-heavy AI systems that need isolated code execution or file operations. Instance-based and marketplace providers typically expose combinations of APIs, CLIs, SDKs, and SSH, while Modal provides a more integrated serverless orchestration model for teams that want infrastructure to scale directly with application demand.